Unethical practices of public service employees

Irresponsible civil servants
Negligent public service employees
Corruption of civil servants
Misrepresentation of government authority
Criminal uses of the public service
Abuse of public interest
Incompetent public officers
Bribery of civil servants

Nature

Employees of government are able to exploit such a position to their personal advantage or to that of others they may favour. Where the employee is in direct contact with outsiders requesting services (processing documents, supplying licenses, approving applications, etc.), such services may only be provided (rapidly) following "under-the-table" payments.

Background

The significance of unethical practices among public service employees gained global attention in the late 20th century, as high-profile scandals and investigative journalism exposed systemic abuses of power, bribery, and favoritism within government institutions. International organizations, such as Transparency International and the United Nations, began systematically documenting these issues, revealing their prevalence across diverse political systems. This growing awareness has prompted worldwide calls for transparency, accountability, and reforms to restore public trust in government services.

Incidence

Unethical practices among public service employees are reported across all continents, affecting both developed and developing nations. Incidents range from bribery and nepotism to misuse of public funds and abuse of authority, undermining public trust and the effective delivery of essential services. High-profile scandals and routine infractions alike have been documented in sectors such as law enforcement, healthcare, and local government, highlighting the persistent and pervasive nature of the issue.
In 2023, a major corruption scandal emerged in South Africa’s Department of Public Works, where senior officials were implicated in fraudulent tender allocations worth millions of rand, prompting national investigations and public outcry.

Claim

Official deceit, disinformation and dissembling are now so routine that they barely merit comment. As public services decay, the public is repeatedly reassured (with the support of suitably massaged statistics) that the generosity and benevolence of the state has never been greater. Public life has fallen into disrepute and the cynicism of the people knows no bounds.

"Indisputably, the greatest change in Washington over the past 25 years has been the preoccupation with money. It has transformed politics and it has subverted values. It has led good people to do things that are morally questionable, if not reprehensible. It has cut a deep gash, if not inflicted a mortal wound, in the concept of the public service." (Elisabeth Drew, veteran Washington journalist).

Counter-claim

The so-called “unethical practices” of public service employees are vastly exaggerated and hardly warrant concern. Most public servants perform their duties with integrity, and isolated incidents do not reflect the system as a whole. Focusing on these rare cases distracts from more pressing societal issues. The public sector is already heavily regulated, making unethical behavior nearly impossible. Therefore, this topic is not an important problem and does not deserve the attention it receives.

Unethical practices of public service employees

Nature

Background

Incidence

Claim

Counter-claim

Broader

Narrower

Aggravates

Aggravated by

Related

Strategy

Value

SDG

Metadata