1. World problems
  2. Unethical military practices

Unethical military practices

  • Corruption in the armed forces
  • Military corruption
  • Blackmail in the military
  • Illegal military activity
  • Incompetent military officers
  • Criminal involvement with the military
  • Scandal in the military
  • Military misconduct
  • Abuse of military power

Nature

Unethical military practices refer to actions by armed forces that violate moral, legal, or humanitarian standards, such as the laws of war and human rights conventions. These practices include torture, targeting civilians, use of prohibited weapons, and mistreatment of prisoners. Such conduct undermines international law, erodes public trust, and can escalate conflicts. Unethical military practices are widely condemned as they cause unnecessary suffering, hinder peace efforts, and damage the legitimacy of military institutions. Addressing this problem requires strict adherence to ethical codes, accountability, and effective oversight to ensure respect for human dignity during armed conflict.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Background

Unethical military practices gained global attention during the 20th century, particularly following revelations of atrocities in World War II and the Vietnam War. International concern intensified with the exposure of systematic abuses, such as torture and targeting of civilians, prompting the establishment of legal frameworks like the Geneva Conventions. Subsequent conflicts, including those in the Balkans and Middle East, further highlighted the persistence and complexity of these practices, spurring ongoing international scrutiny and debate.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Incidence

In India in 1992 inquiries were still continuing into a scandal allegedly involving £32 million in illegal commissions on a £775 million import of arms from a Swedish manufacturer in 1986. The commissions had been paid through a network of intermediary companies and individuals. Allegedly some of the funds were received by the government. The governing party was defeated in 1989, largely as a result of this affair. Even though it regained power in 1991, in 1992 the foreign minister was forced to resign after it emerged that he had formally requested the Swiss government to slow down its investigation of the ownership of the secret accounts into which the disputed amounts were known to have been transferred.

In Israel a major scandal in 1993 involved allegations of kickbacks and fraud in the procurement of weapons from the USA by senior officials of the air force and defence ministry using financial assistance supplied by the USA. Funds were diverted and other officials assisted in covering up the operation.

In South Korea in 1993 5 generals were arrested for giving bribes ranging from US$37,700 to US$377,000 to the air force chief in return for promotions. Similar bribery charges had been made to 5 navy officers for their promotions. In 1993 the defence minister of South Korea offered to resign because of his brother's implication in a scandal involving multi-million dollar arms deals. In Thailand it is alleged that the attempted military coup in 1992 was less a response to corruption in government than against the steady slide of patronage from the military to those with financial power.

In China in 1993 there was widespread concern that commercialization and corruption had undermined the traditional role of the army as a guardian of political stability although, like other organs of the state, they had been encouraged to go into business. The transformation of army factories to civilian commercial use was so successful that by 1992, 70% of its industrial output was for civilian use. The commercial excesses of the army and its disregard of financial discipline aroused concern however. High-ranking officers warned that unhealthy tendencies and negative phenomena were posing a threat to the development of the military. All facets of military life had become subordinate to doing business. It had been necessary to issue a directive to the armed forces banning speculation in foreign currencies and land, as well as involvement in some development projects. There was concern that military funds were being diverted into personal savings accounts. The army general staff reportedly had a direct financial interest in the production and sale of arms around the world. There were strong family links between arms dealers and the Chinese leadership. In 1993 army entrepreneurs had been exposed in a major scandal as providing kickbacks whilst the navy had been heavily involved in smuggling vehicles from Japan and South Korea. Army licence plates were being sold to criminals to discourage investigation by the police.

In the USA considerable publicity was given to the improper conduct, including sexual harassment, on the occasion of an annual convention in 1991 of the Tailhook Association, a private group of navy aviators. The Pentagon report implicated 117 officers, finding that 51 had lied during investigations into their behaviour. The report found that 83 women and 7 men had been assaulted on that occasion. Of the 117, 23 were determined to have participated in indecent assaults and an additional 23 in indecent exposure. The 1,500 participants included 33 admirals.

In the UK in 1993 it was alleged that an army officer had used confidential advance information about the movement of equipment and supplies for UK troops in the Gulf War to arrange for a particular shipbroker to benefit by supplying the necessary shipping. As a result only 8 UK ships profited from the 146 voyages in a £180 million operation.

Claim

Unethical military practices are a grave and urgent problem that threaten the very foundation of human rights and international law. Such actions not only inflict immense suffering on innocent civilians but also erode global trust and fuel cycles of violence. Ignoring these abuses undermines justice and morality worldwide. It is imperative that the international community confronts and condemns unethical military conduct to protect human dignity and ensure lasting peace.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Counter-claim

The notion that unethical military practices are a significant problem is vastly overstated. In reality, such incidents are rare exceptions, not the norm, and are often sensationalized by the media. Modern militaries operate under strict codes of conduct and international law, ensuring accountability. Focusing on these isolated cases distracts from more pressing global issues. Therefore, the concern over unethical military practices is largely exaggerated and does not warrant serious attention.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Broader

Narrower

Secret armies
Presentable
Military offences
Unpresentable
Military brutality
Unpresentable
Military elitism
Yet to rate

Aggravates

Threat of war
Yet to rate

Aggravated by

Military secrecy
Presentable
Militarism
Presentable
Abuse of power
Presentable
Military rivalry
Unpresentable

Related

Military reprisals
Unpresentable
Military blocs
Unpresentable
Mercenary troops
Unpresentable

Strategy

Value

Unethical
Yet to rate
Scandal
Yet to rate
Abuse
Yet to rate
Crime
Yet to rate
Corruption
Yet to rate
Illegality
Yet to rate
Misconduct
Yet to rate
Incompetence
Yet to rate

SDG

Sustainable Development Goal #16: Peace and Justice Strong Institutions

Metadata

Database
World problems
Type
(C) Cross-sectoral problems
Biological classification
N/A
Subject
  • Action » Action
  • Defence » Military
  • Defence » Military forces » Military forces
  • Innovative change » Change
  • Law » Legality
  • Societal problems » Corruption
  • Societal problems » Crime
  • Societal problems » Maltreatment
  • Content quality
    Unpresentable
     Unpresentable
    Language
    English
    1A4N
    D7360
    DOCID
    11473600
    D7NID
    133461
    Editing link
    Official link
    Last update
    May 20, 2022