Overemphasis on institutional security

Nature

Overemphasis on institutional security refers to the excessive prioritization of protecting an organization’s assets, reputation, or stability—often at the expense of transparency, individual rights, or innovation. This problem can manifest in rigid policies, surveillance, or resistance to change, potentially stifling open communication and ethical accountability. Such an approach may undermine trust, hinder adaptability, and create environments where misconduct is concealed rather than addressed. Ultimately, overemphasis on institutional security can compromise the institution’s long-term effectiveness and public legitimacy by prioritizing self-preservation over broader social or organizational responsibilities.

Background

The problem of overemphasis on institutional security emerged prominently during the Cold War, as governments and organizations prioritized internal stability over transparency and adaptability. This trend intensified with the rise of global terrorism and cyber threats in the early 21st century, prompting widespread adoption of rigid protocols. Scholars and watchdog groups began documenting the unintended consequences, such as stifled innovation and erosion of public trust, highlighting the global scope and complexity of this phenomenon.

Incidence

Overemphasis on institutional security has become increasingly prevalent across various sectors worldwide, including government, education, and healthcare. This trend often manifests in heightened surveillance, restricted access, and prioritization of organizational interests over individual rights or community needs. Such measures can erode public trust, stifle innovation, and marginalize vulnerable groups, with global reports indicating a steady rise in security-driven policies since the early 2000s.
In 2022, several universities in Hong Kong intensified campus security protocols, installing extensive surveillance systems and limiting student gatherings. These actions, justified as necessary for institutional safety, drew criticism for suppressing academic freedom and open discourse.

Claim

Social organizations and institutions - school, family, corporation, etc. – are all restricted by being based on (and emphasizing) narrow images of personal and institutional security. This traps people into thinking that all relationships should avoid stress, conflict and risk.

Counter-claim

The so-called “overemphasis on institutional security” is a manufactured concern with no real substance. In an age of increasing threats, prioritizing security is not just prudent—it’s essential. Institutions must protect their people, assets, and information. Suggesting that this focus is problematic ignores the real risks and undermines public trust. Frankly, there are far more pressing issues to address; this is simply not an important problem at all.