Using censorship


  • Protecting public morality
  • Censoring
  • Practicing bowdlerization

Description

Restricting the public expression of ideas, opinions, conceptions and impulses or the dissemination of facts which have or are believed to have the capacity to undermine the governing authority or the social and moral order upon which the social group is founded. The full process of censorship involves proclaiming common ends or values for the community, drawing up programmes of adherence, action and ideology to achieve them, establishing devices and agencies to enforce them, and enumerating crimes, sins, errors, obscenities, heresies and treasons by which the community is endangered; thus they must be controlled.

Context

Censorship has been present in various forms in many cultures throughout history. It is a part of the history of learning, education, political institutions, religious beliefs and the arts. It is linked with the basic tension between certainty and insecurity, cohesiveness and fragmentation. Basic types include political censorship, religious censorship, moral censorship (related to definitions of obscenity), intellectual censorship (related to academic freedom) and military censorship.

Implementation

Censorship takes place through public legal acts of authorities to sanction, negate, prohibit or restrict publication or expression. This can be done as prior restriction through licensing or prepublication approval or as post facto restriction through punishment or seizure of material already made public. Indirect means of censorship are also employed including cultural approaches such as publication of banned lists, formation of pressure groups and lobbies, smear campaigns etc. Most subtle and indirect are economic means of censorship including prohibitively high pricing, monopolistic publishing, copyright laws etc.

Claim

  1. Unbridled license of expression is a menace to the common good of society.

  2. Those who are qualified to identify evil should be empowered to prevent its dissemination.

  3. Ideas which are false and/or dangerous by the standards of the authority in power must be suppressed.

  4. Ideas that lead to anti-social action may be censored.

  5. Some things are morally repugnant and should be prohibited.

Counter claim

  1. Freedom of speech is an absolute right.

  2. Obstacles to freedom and distortions of democracy are dangerous symptoms in every society.

  3. Any form of censorship leads to tyrannical, unnecessary and fruitless control of expression.

  4. It is impossible to formulate effective rules.

  5. A man is free only so long as he is empowered to make his own choices.

  6. Virtue only exists as it is able to overcome temptation.


© 2021-2023 AskTheFox.org by Vacilando.org
Official presentation at encyclopedia.uia.org