Uncoordinated policy-making

Social development policy and planning conventionally deals with social issues on a piecemeal basis. A policy approach that treats each issue separately results in a plethora of government offices to deal with individual social concerns. This fails to recognize the fundamental importance of inter-sectoral coordination at all stages of the planning cycle. Coordination is essential both horizontally across sectors and vertically between the central and local levels.

1. Obsolete policy-making

1. Uncoordinated government policy-making
2. Short-range planning for long-term development
3. Policy vacuum
4. Inadequate environmental impact assessment
5. Imbalance in economic relationships among countries

1. Unrealistic policies
2. Unpredictable governmental policy
3. Policy-making delays
4. Policy disputes
5. Lack of international policy on specific issues
6. Inappropriate policies
7. Domination of government policy-making by short-term considerations

1. Risk-aversion strategy
2. Policy-making bias
3. Lack of systems for achieving grassroots agreement
4. Irresponsible delimitation of policy responsibilities
5. Institutional fragmentation
6. Fragmentation of evidence
7. Failure to integrate knowledge to empower humanity in response to the global problematique

1. Politicization of decision-making

1. Self-destructive government policy-making
2. Irresponsible policy-making

1. Simplifying methods of policy formation
2. Ensuring national policy-making in a global world
3. Developing policy
4. Coordinating policy-making
5. Contradicting

1. Contradiction
2. Inconsistency
3. Piecemeal
4. Fragmentation
5. Cumbersome
6. Uncoordinated