Denial of the right of association
- Denial of right of association
- Denial of freedom of association
Nature
Associations and assemblies founded and organized by groups for purposes that a government considers to be subversive (such as political, trade union, or occult associations) may be suppressed, thus maintaining existing inequalities, exploitation and elitism. Where such associations are formed, official discovery may lead to imprisonment and torture.
Background
The denial of the right of association emerged as a global concern in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as labor movements and civil society organizations faced systematic suppression. International attention intensified following the establishment of the International Labour Organization in 1919, which highlighted widespread restrictions. Subsequent decades saw increased documentation by human rights bodies, revealing persistent violations across political, economic, and social spheres, prompting ongoing international advocacy and legal reforms.
Incidence
Denial of the right of association remains a pervasive issue affecting millions globally, with governments and private entities in numerous countries restricting or prohibiting the formation of trade unions, political parties, and civil society organizations. Such restrictions are particularly acute in authoritarian regimes, but also occur in democracies through legal barriers, intimidation, or violence, undermining collective bargaining, advocacy, and social cohesion on a significant scale.
In 2023, authorities in Belarus intensified their crackdown on independent trade unions, dissolving several organizations and arresting union leaders. This action followed widespread protests and was condemned by international human rights groups for violating workers’ rights to freely associate.
In 2023, authorities in Belarus intensified their crackdown on independent trade unions, dissolving several organizations and arresting union leaders. This action followed widespread protests and was condemned by international human rights groups for violating workers’ rights to freely associate.
Claim
The denial of the right of association is a grave injustice that undermines the very foundation of a free and democratic society. Preventing individuals from organizing, expressing collective interests, or forming groups silences dissent, enables oppression, and erodes human dignity. This violation stifles progress, weakens communities, and perpetuates inequality. Protecting the right of association is not optional—it is essential for justice, social cohesion, and the defense of fundamental human rights everywhere.
Counter-claim
The so-called "denial of the right of association" is vastly overstated and hardly a pressing issue. In today’s world, people have countless ways to connect, organize, and express themselves, both online and offline. Societies function perfectly well without constant group agitation. Prioritizing this so-called right distracts from more urgent problems. Frankly, the fuss over association rights is unnecessary and does not deserve the attention it receives.
Broader
Narrower
Aggravates
Aggravated by
Related
Strategy
Value
Reference
SDG
Metadata
Database
World problems
Type
(D) Detailed problems
Biological classification
N/A
Subject
Social activity » Fellowship
Societal problems » Deprivation
Content quality
Presentable
Language
English
1A4N
D3224
DOCID
11432240
D7NID
140313
Editing link
Official link
Last update
Oct 4, 2020