1. World problems
  2. Decline in foreign direct investment

Decline in foreign direct investment

  • Disincentives to foreign private investment

Nature

A poor investment climate is made up of the following elements: cumbersome administrative procedures and inefficient decision-making processes which companies encounter when planning an investment; transportation bottlenecks; unfair competition from local companies; lack of balance in policies toward foreign investment accompanied by politically explosive issues which may lead to disruptive and costly litigation between the government and foreign companies; high intrinsic risks often associated with such investment; restrictions on the repatriation of profits; ignorance of investment opportunities; and the limited nature of the markets for manufactured products.

The investment climate in developing countries tends to discourage foreign direct investment. Factors which deter resource developers, for example, include fiscal and statutory instability in the host country, the requirement for parent company guarantees, insecurity of financial holdings and profits held within the country, and lack of international arbitration procedures in the event of disputes. Companies may spend very large amounts on feasibility and development studies and find they stand to lose these investments because a government has imposed unreasonable or arbitrary requirements inconsistent with the economics of the project. From the government's side, it clearly needs to attract investment and develop its resources, but it must be constrained by the extent of damage to local interests that should be permitted for the sake of a profitable project. Because of the politically sensitive nature of such investment issues, and despite all the measures taken to stimulate it, direct investment has long been the least dynamic element in the flow of private capital to developing countries.

Background

The decline in foreign direct investment (FDI) emerged as a significant global concern during the late 1990s Asian financial crisis, when abrupt capital withdrawals exposed vulnerabilities in emerging economies. Subsequent downturns, notably after the 2008 global financial crisis and during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighted the problem’s persistence and complexity. International organizations, such as UNCTAD, began systematically tracking FDI flows, deepening awareness of its critical role in economic development and the risks posed by sustained declines.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Incidence

World wide flows of foreign direct investment (FDI) tripled in the period 1984-87, but are concentrated in industrialized countries more than ever before. Total outflows from all countries increased 38% in 1985, 58% in 1986 and 44% in 1987. At the same time, developing countries' share of investment inflows declined from 27% of the total in 1981-83 to 21% in 1984-87, while industrialized countries, particularly the USA and western Europe, increased their share of total inflows.

Total FDI flows in 1993 amounted to $195 billion, up from $171 billion in 1992. Developing countries attracted $80 billion representing 40 percent of the global total. Of this portion 57 percent went to South and South-East Asia; China received $26 billion of FDI in 1993. There are still a number of markets in the region, notably India, that have yet to be fully tapped by foreign investors. Investments in Latin America and the Caribbean were up, but flows to all of Africa were just $3 billion. Flows to Central and Eastern Europe amounted to only $5 billion.

Statistics from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP, reported to Rio+5 conference in 1997, are that 80 percent of direct foreign investment in the developing world goes to only a dozen countries, all classified as "middle income" with the exception of China. Just five percent goes to Africa and one percent to the 48 least developed nations.

Claim

The decline in foreign direct investment is a critical problem that threatens economic growth, job creation, and technological advancement. Without robust FDI, countries risk stagnation, reduced competitiveness, and diminished global influence. This alarming trend undermines development opportunities, especially for emerging economies, and signals a loss of investor confidence. Immediate, decisive action is essential to reverse this decline and safeguard the prosperity and stability of nations worldwide. Ignoring it is simply not an option.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Counter-claim

The so-called "decline in foreign direct investment" is vastly overblown and hardly a crisis. Economies are resilient and can thrive on domestic innovation and entrepreneurship. Obsessing over foreign capital ignores the power of local businesses and homegrown solutions. Instead of panicking, we should focus on strengthening internal markets and self-reliance. The world does not end when FDI dips—sometimes, it’s even a sign of healthy, sustainable economic evolution.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Broader

Lack of incentives
Unpresentable
Disincentives
Yet to rate
Decline
Yet to rate

Narrower

Aggravates

Aggravated by

Reduced by

Related

Strategy

Value

Disincentive
Unpresentable
Incentives
Yet to rate
Foreign
Yet to rate
Decline
Yet to rate

Reference

SDG

Sustainable Development Goal #8: Decent Work and Economic GrowthSustainable Development Goal #9: Industry, Innovation and InfrastructureSustainable Development Goal #10: Reduced InequalitySustainable Development Goal #16: Peace and Justice Strong InstitutionsSustainable Development Goal #17: Partnerships to achieve the Goal

Metadata

Database
World problems
Type
(D) Detailed problems
Biological classification
N/A
Subject
Content quality
Presentable
 Presentable
Language
English
1A4N
D3138
DOCID
11431380
D7NID
140351
Editing link
Official link
Last update
Oct 4, 2020