Authoritarianism


  • Dependence on authoritarianism
  • Authoritarian people
  • Authoritarian movements

Description

Authoritarianism is a political system characterized by a controlling government and the rejection of democracy, human rights, and political plurality. It involves the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government. Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military. States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have some times been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states. The political scientist Juan Linz, in an influential 1964 work, An Authoritarian Regime: Spain, defined authoritarianism as possessing four qualities: * 1) Limited political pluralism, which is achieved with constraints on the legislature, political parties and interest groups. * 2) Political legitimacy based on appeals to emotion and identification of the regime as a necessary evil to combat "easily recognizable societal problems, such as underdevelopment or insurgency." * 3) Minimal political mobilization, and suppression of anti-regime activities. * 4) Ill-defined executive powers, often vague and shifting, used to extend the power of the executive. Minimally defined, an authoritarian government lacks free and competitive direct elections to legislatures, free and competitive direct or indirect elections for executives, or both. Broadly defined, authoritarian states include countries that lack civil liberties such as freedom of religion, or countries in which the government and the opposition do not alternate in power at least once following free elections. Authoritarian states might contain nominally democratic institutions such as political parties, legislatures and elections which are managed to entrench authoritarian rule and can feature fraudulent, non-competitive elections. In contexts of democratic backsliding, scholars tend to identify authoritarian political leaders based on certain tactics, such as: politicizing independent institutions, spreading disinformation, aggrandizing executive power, quashing dissent, targeting vulnerable communities, stoking violence, and corrupting elections. Since 1946, the share of authoritarian states in the international political system increased until the mid-1970s but declined from then until the year 2000.
Source: Wikipedia

Claim

  1. The frequently friendless authoritarians are vectors of stress whether throughout the work unit, the enterprise, the community or the government, depending on their number or the reach of their influence. They can never be re-educated to be other than what they are and must simply be broken by time and events. Weak persons may revel in the idea that they are authoritarian, giving them an imaginary strength, while in reality they are petty, as is frequently exhibited in family roles

Counter claim

  1. Every strong leader or government is accused of being authoritarian. Leadership, however, entails the confidence of knowing that one is right. This is not a subject for negotiation, or the verbal wrongs of those who are in a subordinate place or of those whose many and diverse interests may have to be considered. The leader acts, not only speaks, for all. Great enterprises are launched and carried to success only by the strong, acting with dispatch and unfettered by consultations. Authoritarianism's emphasis on order and discipline has been a major factor in the economic success of many countries.

Related


© 2021-2023 AskTheFox.org by Vacilando.org
Official presentation at encyclopedia.uia.org