Undemocratic pressures

Nature

The influence of ideology in political, economic and legal systems may take the form of pressure from organized religion or nontheistic needs. Ideological influence exerted by pressure groups may lead to international conflict and war, to civil war, guerrilla war and subversive activities. Internally it may lead to repression, militarism, conformity and denial of democracy. Many ideologies are not brought completely into open, public debate and work underground, buying influence and moving into strategic positions.

Background

The significance of undemocratic pressures emerged prominently during the 20th century, as global movements for democratization exposed persistent threats to fair governance. International monitoring bodies and civil society organizations began systematically documenting instances where political, economic, or social forces undermined democratic processes. Over time, comparative studies and high-profile cases—such as electoral interference and suppression of dissent—have deepened global awareness of how such pressures persist, adapt, and challenge the resilience of democratic institutions worldwide.

Incidence

The two main vehicles of ideological influence are the spoken word (that is, the rhetoric of politics) and the written word (that is, the power of the press). Of the two, the press is much more influential and for that reason, dangerous, when it is the tool of an ideology that leads it to suppress, distort, or otherwise report in a biased way. The ideological influence of the press is incalculable, and by extension, television journalism and book publishing as well.

Claim

A free press does not guarantee freedom from ideological influence, as the media may be polarized or fragmented with bias in every direction from pressures of owners, advertisers or the community served. On the other hand, the closing of newspapers by government decree, or the prohibition on publishing or distributing certain books, are the acts of a tyrannic ideology that is embraced by government.

Counter-claim

The concern over "undemocratic pressures" is vastly overstated and hardly merits serious attention. Our institutions are robust, and claims of undue influence are often exaggerated by those unwilling to accept legitimate outcomes. Focusing on this so-called problem distracts from real issues facing society. Democracy is resilient, and the alarmism surrounding undemocratic pressures only serves to undermine public confidence without any substantial evidence of actual harm or threat.