Tribal conflicts within states

Internal conflict due to tribalism
Tribal conflict with states
National instability due to tribalism
Disruption of development by tribal warfare
Clan warfare
Tribal friction

Nature

Warfare between different tribal groups, usually within the same 'national' boundary, causes disruption and disunity in the nation. Tribal warfare and conflict have been known to disrupt rural development programmes. This factor comes into play particularly when an extensive development programme takes in several ethnic groups. Since rural development programmes attract strangers into otherwise closely-knit homogenous rural communities, conflicts in morals, manners and of personality often create potentially explosive situations which require the talents of competent social workers to resolve.

Background

Tribal conflicts within states gained international attention during the decolonization period of the mid-20th century, as newly-formed nations struggled with internal divisions. The Rwandan genocide (1994) and Sudanese civil wars highlighted the devastating impact of such conflicts, prompting global concern. Over time, scholars and policymakers recognized that these disputes often stem from historical grievances, resource competition, and political marginalization, leading to increased research and intervention efforts by organizations such as the United Nations and International Crisis Group.

Incidence

Tribal warfare has been recently reported in the Philippines, Burundi, Rwanda, Sudan, and South Africa. According to a 1993 report, nearly 8,000 Zulu tribesmen of the Kwazulu-Natal region in South Africa have been killed as a result of tribal warfare since 1985. Since its independence, clan fighting and killing have erupted periodically between Hutus and Tutsis in Burundi, as in 1969, 1972 (around 300,000 dead), 1988, 1993 and 1994, when it is estimated that at least 100,000 were killed and 700,000 displaced to refugee camps in Rwanda, Tanzania or Zaire. In 1996 in Somalia, more than 9,000 people were driven to flee as a result of clan warfare in the Juba river valley. Following withdrawal of the UN peacekeeping troops in 1995, the country splintered into several parts, each governed by a different clan warlord concerned to increase his territory.

Claim

Tribal conflicts within states are a grave and urgent problem that threatens social cohesion, economic development, and human rights. These conflicts fuel violence, displacement, and deep-seated mistrust, undermining national unity and stability. Ignoring them perpetuates cycles of poverty and suffering, making sustainable progress impossible. Addressing tribal conflicts must be a top priority for governments and the international community, as peace and prosperity are unattainable while such divisions persist.

Counter-claim

Tribal conflicts within states are vastly overstated and do not constitute a significant problem in today’s world. Modern governance, economic integration, and global communication have rendered such disputes largely irrelevant. Most societies have moved beyond tribal divisions, focusing instead on national unity and progress. Resources and attention should be directed toward more pressing global issues like climate change, technological advancement, and economic inequality, rather than dwelling on outdated and minor tribal disagreements.