1. World problems
  2. Structural failure of integrated rural development

Structural failure of integrated rural development

Nature

Excessive urbanization and the concentration of investment in urban-oriented, capital-intensive activities have produced a severe imbalance within developing countries between the urban elite groups that monopolize power and wealth, and the majority of the rural population that remains poor; this despite the fact that the cost of bringing a person to an urban area is often much greater than the cost of providing social infrastructure to keep that person in the rural area. Rural industrialization is not meeting its aim of bringing city comforts to the rural areas, thereby creating a rural-urban continuum; it is, instead, creating a rural-urban conflict.

Incidence

A 2005 evaluation by the World Bank found that over 60% of integrated rural development (IRD) projects in sub-Saharan Africa failed to meet their objectives, often due to poor coordination and lack of local participation. Similar patterns have been observed in South Asia and Latin America, where large-scale IRD initiatives have struggled to achieve sustainable outcomes, resulting in wasted resources and limited impact on rural poverty.
In the 1980s, the Integrated Rural Development Programme in India, one of the world’s largest IRD efforts, was widely criticized for its limited success. A 1989 government review revealed significant misallocation of funds and inadequate beneficiary targeting across several states.
This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Claim

The structural failure of integrated rural development is a critical issue that cannot be ignored. It perpetuates poverty, stifles economic growth, and exacerbates social inequalities in rural areas. Without cohesive strategies that address infrastructure, education, and healthcare, communities remain trapped in a cycle of underdevelopment. This failure not only undermines the potential of rural populations but also threatens national stability and progress. Urgent action is needed to rectify these systemic shortcomings and empower rural communities for a sustainable future.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Counter-claim

The notion of structural failure in integrated rural development is overstated and distracts from more pressing issues. Rural areas face challenges that are often misattributed to development strategies rather than systemic problems like climate change, market access, and governance. Focusing on perceived failures diverts resources and attention from innovative solutions that can genuinely uplift rural communities. Instead of fixating on structural failures, we should prioritize practical, grassroots initiatives that address the real needs of rural populations.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Broader

Narrower

Aggravates

Aggravated by

Related

Strategy

Value

Failure
Yet to rate

Reference

SDG

Sustainable Development Goal #17: Partnerships to achieve the Goal

Metadata

Database
World problems
Type
(C) Cross-sectoral problems
Biological classification
N/A
Subject
  • Amenities » Rural
  • Development » Development
  • Industry » Construction
  • Societal problems » Failure
  • Content quality
    Presentable
     Presentable
    Language
    English
    1A4N
    C6242
    DOCID
    11362420
    D7NID
    146237
    Last update
    May 20, 2022
    Official link