Secret laws
- Secret regulations
- Secret government procedures
Nature
It is inconsistent with fundamental notions of justice to convict or punish persons for violations of laws, decrees, or regulations which have been kept secret, or have not received sufficient publication to give notice to such persons, or whose contents is not available or accessible to the general public or persons affected by such laws.
Background
The problem of secret laws gained global prominence during the late 20th century, as revelations about undisclosed legal directives and classified regulations surfaced in democratic and authoritarian states alike. Notably, controversies such as the USA’s secret legal memos post-9/11 and the European Court of Human Rights’ scrutiny of undisclosed surveillance laws highlighted the risks to transparency and accountability. Growing international concern has since spurred debates on the legitimacy and oversight of such clandestine legal frameworks.
Incidence
Secret laws, which are statutes or regulations kept hidden from the public, have been reported in numerous countries, undermining transparency and accountability in governance. Their existence is often justified on grounds of national security, but they can be used to bypass public scrutiny and judicial oversight. The prevalence of secret laws is difficult to quantify due to their concealed nature, but investigative reports and legal challenges indicate that both democratic and authoritarian regimes have employed such measures, raising global concerns about the erosion of civil liberties and the rule of law.
In the United States, the existence of secret legal interpretations by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) came to light in 2013, following Edward Snowden’s disclosures. These secret rulings authorized extensive surveillance programs without public knowledge or debate, sparking widespread controversy and calls for reform.
In the United States, the existence of secret legal interpretations by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) came to light in 2013, following Edward Snowden’s disclosures. These secret rulings authorized extensive surveillance programs without public knowledge or debate, sparking widespread controversy and calls for reform.
Claim
Secret laws are a grave threat to democracy and justice. When laws are hidden from the public, citizens cannot know their rights or hold authorities accountable. This secrecy breeds abuse of power, erodes trust in government, and undermines the very foundation of a free society. No one should be subject to rules they cannot see or challenge. Secret laws are an urgent problem that must be confronted and eliminated immediately.
Counter-claim
The concern over "secret laws" is vastly overblown. In reality, most legal systems operate with transparency, and the rare instances of classified regulations are necessary for national security. Public paranoia about hidden rules distracts from genuine issues. The idea that secret laws threaten democracy is exaggerated; oversight mechanisms exist. Worrying about this is a waste of energy—there are far more pressing problems deserving our attention and resources.
Broader
Aggravates
Aggravated by
Related
Strategy
Value
SDG
Metadata
Database
World problems
Type
(D) Detailed problems
Biological classification
N/A
Subject
- Cybernetics » Cybernetics
- Defence » Secrecy
- Government » Government
- Law » Law
- Law » Regulation
Content quality
Presentable
Language
English
1A4N
C6757
DOCID
11367570
D7NID
157143
Editing link
Official link
Last update
Apr 19, 2024