Restriction of arms supply
Nature
Governments may apply restrictions on the sale of arms to another country. Such restrictive measures may only come into force when the recipient country becomes involved in an international conflict, when it is feared that the supply of arms to countries in conflict will implicate the supplier in the dispute and compromise its neutrality. Such policies effectively prevent the supply of spare parts and replacements in times of conflict, thus endangering the military viability of the recipient country and its ability to defend itself against aggression.
Background
The global significance of restricting arms supply emerged prominently during the Cold War, as superpower rivalries fueled proxy conflicts through extensive weapons transfers. International concern intensified following revelations of arms flows exacerbating regional wars and humanitarian crises, notably in Africa and the Middle East. The 1990s saw increased advocacy for regulation, culminating in multilateral initiatives such as the UN Register of Conventional Arms and, later, the 2013 Arms Trade Treaty, reflecting growing recognition of the issue’s transnational impact.
Incidence
Restrictions on arms supply have significant global repercussions, often influencing the dynamics of ongoing conflicts and humanitarian crises. Such limitations, whether imposed unilaterally or multilaterally, can affect the balance of power in volatile regions, hinder the ability of states or groups to defend themselves, and sometimes exacerbate illicit arms trafficking. The scope of this issue is evident in numerous conflict zones where embargoes or export controls have shaped the course of violence and security.
In 2023, the European Union extended its arms embargo on Myanmar in response to ongoing human rights abuses by the military junta. This restriction aimed to limit the junta’s access to weapons, but reports indicated continued illicit arms flows into the country, undermining the embargo’s effectiveness.
In 2023, the European Union extended its arms embargo on Myanmar in response to ongoing human rights abuses by the military junta. This restriction aimed to limit the junta’s access to weapons, but reports indicated continued illicit arms flows into the country, undermining the embargo’s effectiveness.
Claim
The restriction of arms supply is a critical global issue that demands urgent attention. Unchecked arms trading fuels conflicts, empowers violent regimes, and leads to countless civilian deaths. Without strict controls, weapons easily fall into the wrong hands, destabilizing entire regions and undermining peace efforts. Ignoring this problem is not just irresponsible—it is complicit in perpetuating violence and suffering worldwide. We must prioritize and enforce robust arms supply restrictions to protect humanity’s future.
Counter-claim
Restrictive policies help to restrain or contain conflicts and prevent them from escalating or involving the supplying countries.
Broader
Aggravates
Aggravated by
Reduces
Strategy
Value
SDG
Metadata
Database
World problems
Type
(D) Detailed problems
Biological classification
N/A
Subject
- Commerce » Purchasing, supplying
- Defence » Arms
- Societal problems » Restrictions
Content quality
Presentable
Language
English
1A4N
D1304
DOCID
11413040
D7NID
160713
Editing link
Official link
Last update
Oct 4, 2020