Restriction of arms supply

Nature

Governments may apply restrictions on the sale of arms to another country. Such restrictive measures may only come into force when the recipient country becomes involved in an international conflict, when it is feared that the supply of arms to countries in conflict will implicate the supplier in the dispute and compromise its neutrality. Such policies effectively prevent the supply of spare parts and replacements in times of conflict, thus endangering the military viability of the recipient country and its ability to defend itself against aggression.

Incidence

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), over 30 countries have been subject to formal arms embargoes or restrictions by the United Nations, European Union, or individual states since 1990, often affecting conflict zones in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. These restrictions can significantly limit the ability of governments or groups to procure weapons, impacting both state and non-state actors.
In 2011, the United Nations imposed an arms embargo on Libya during the civil conflict, prohibiting the supply of weapons to all parties. Despite the embargo, reports indicated that the restriction hampered the internationally recognized government's ability to defend itself, while illicit arms flows continued.

Claim

The unrestricted supply of arms fuels conflict, exacerbates humanitarian crises, and destabilizes entire regions. It empowers oppressive regimes and terrorist organizations, leading to widespread suffering and loss of innocent lives. The global community must prioritize the restriction of arms supply to promote peace, safeguard human rights, and prevent the escalation of violence. Without decisive action, we risk perpetuating a cycle of destruction that undermines security and prosperity for future generations. The time for change is now.