Personal and social maladjustment

Dysfunctional social behaviour

Nature

A condition or process involving the inability or unwillingness to conform to prevailing standards of an external system or of one's own.

Background

Personal and social maladjustment emerged as a recognized global concern in the early 20th century, as industrialization and urbanization disrupted traditional social structures. Its significance grew with post-war studies highlighting links to juvenile delinquency and mental health crises. International attention intensified in the 1960s and 1970s, as cross-cultural research and global migration patterns revealed the widespread impact of maladjustment on educational systems, workplace productivity, and community cohesion.

Incidence

Personal and social maladjustment affects millions globally, manifesting in increased rates of school dropout, workplace conflict, social isolation, and mental health challenges. Studies indicate that up to 20% of adolescents worldwide experience significant difficulties in adapting to social norms, leading to long-term consequences for community cohesion and economic productivity. The problem is observed across diverse cultures and socioeconomic backgrounds, highlighting its pervasive nature.
In 2022, a national survey in Japan reported a sharp rise in "hikikomori" cases—individuals withdrawing from social life—reaching over 1.5 million people. This surge was attributed to pandemic-related disruptions and growing societal pressures.

Claim

Personal and social maladjustment is a critical problem that cannot be ignored. It undermines individual well-being, disrupts families, and erodes the fabric of society. When people struggle to adapt, it leads to increased mental health issues, social isolation, and even crime. Addressing maladjustment is essential for building healthy communities and ensuring everyone has the opportunity to thrive. Ignoring this issue is both irresponsible and dangerous for our collective future.

Counter-claim

Personal and social maladjustment is vastly overemphasized and does not warrant the concern it receives. People naturally differ in how they interact and adapt; labeling these differences as "maladjustment" pathologizes normal human variation. Society should focus on genuine issues rather than inventing problems out of harmless quirks. The obsession with adjustment only stifles individuality and creativity, making this so-called problem trivial and unworthy of serious attention.