1. World problems
  2. Irresponsible health professionals

Irresponsible health professionals

  • Negligence by medical specialists
  • Medical negligence
  • Medical irresponsibility
  • Unregulated health practitioners

Nature

Most incompetent medical decisions remain private, confined to and rarely challenged by medically unsophisticated patients who are likely to be frightened or intimidated. This is clearly compounded by the unwillingness of other practitioners to speak up against their colleagues.

Background

The global significance of irresponsible health professionals emerged in the mid-20th century, as medical scandals and malpractice cases gained international attention. Investigations into unethical conduct, such as the thalidomide tragedy and unethical clinical trials, highlighted systemic failures in oversight. Subsequent decades saw increased scrutiny from regulatory bodies and the World Health Organization, as cross-border mobility of health workers and globalization of healthcare services amplified concerns about professional accountability and patient safety worldwide.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Incidence

In the UK in 1986 it was reported that the amount cost of medical negligence or incompetence was £19 million. Abuses have been reported in hospitals and health care facilities, and in the private offices or treatment facilities of practitioners. Specialists, as opposed to general practitioners, are most cited and frequently those treating women. In 1991-92, 1,300 complaints were received by the General Medical Council; however, in the same year only 24 reached the health procedures and 34 the conduct committee.

In the USA in 1989 it was reported that there was far more medical malpractice than indicated by malpractice suits, with over 1% of hospital patients surveyed having been treated negligently. Of those so treated only 3% filed lawsuits because of the expense, the need for expensive expert witnesses and the years required to complete the trial.

Claim

Character defects may well cause more injury than the more apparent and sensational issues of scientific ignorance, physical impairment, inexperience, substance abuse, or sexual misconduct. For example, surrendering to the desire to earn money rapidly at a patient's expense and risk; personal pride resulting in the rejection of peer advice over treatment of a patient. It is often such flaws in a practitioner's character, rather than lack of intelligence or skill, that is an essential cause of incompetence.

Beware of the physician who is good at getting out of trouble.

Counter-claim

The notion that irresponsible health professionals are a significant problem is vastly overstated. The vast majority of healthcare workers are dedicated, ethical, and highly trained. Isolated incidents do not reflect the profession as a whole. Strict regulations and oversight ensure accountability, making irresponsibility a rare exception rather than a widespread issue. Focusing on this supposed problem distracts from more pressing healthcare challenges that genuinely impact patient outcomes and system effectiveness.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Broader

Narrower

Medical quackery
Presentable

Aggravates

Aggravated by

Fear of death
Yet to rate

Strategy

Neglecting health
Unpresentable

Value

Unregulated
Yet to rate
Responsibility
Yet to rate
Negligence
Yet to rate
Irresponsibility
Yet to rate
Health
Yet to rate
Badness
Yet to rate
Incompetence
Yet to rate

SDG

Sustainable Development Goal #3: Good Health and Well-being

Metadata

Database
World problems
Type
(D) Detailed problems
Biological classification
N/A
Subject
Content quality
Presentable
 Presentable
Language
English
1A4N
J0755
DOCID
12007550
D7NID
157310
Editing link
Official link
Last update
May 20, 2022