Internationally non-cooperative governments

The UN Security Council, in 1992, accused Iraq of engaging in serious "non-compliance" by concealing information on its nuclear capability and installations, falsifying its count of ballistic missiles, and seeking to evade destruction of equipment capable of producing weapons by claiming it was intended for peaceful purposes.

1. Unethical practices of government
2. Refusal to participate
3. Lack of international cooperation

1. Rogue states
2. Resistance to internationally agreed standards
3. Non-verification of compliance
4. Irresponsible members of international organizations
5. Government support for repressive regimes
6. Government inaction on alleged human rights violations
7. Conflicting interpretations of universal human rights

1. Tourist hazards
2. Suppression of information concerning environmental problems
3. Limited acceptance of international treaties
4. Limited acceptance of human rights treaties
5. Disregard for internationally imposed economic sanctions
6. Denial of human rights
7. Bias in United Nations response to human rights

1. Non-verificability of compliance with nuclear power safeguards
2. Non-verifiability of compliance with nuclear arms treaties
3. Communist opposition to international organizations

1. Official cover-up of government harassment of political activists
2. Irresponsibility of member governments of the United Nations
3. Government non-payment of agreed financial contributions to international organizations

1. Undermining governments abusing human rights
2. Providing technical assistance on human rights
3. Cooperating in eliminating human rights violations

1. Violation
2. Unwillingness