1. World problems
  2. International imbalance in the quality of life

International imbalance in the quality of life

Nature

A major objective of development is the growth of per capita income in the developing countries, as one of the means to improve living conditions and reduce international disparities in income and wealth. Further, the inadequacy of housing, and the lack of basic amenities such as drinking water and sanitation, not only affect the quality of life but also the rates of morbidity and mortality. An improvement in quality of life requires not only population policies, but also programmes to improve nutritional intake, provide new and renewable sources of energy, and to improve living conditions. While there is probably no single index of the level of living that can be applied in internationally, there are four recognized demographic variables associated with a better quality of life: longer life expectancy, lower mortality rates for all age groups of the population, lower morbidity rates, and lower fertility rates.

Background

The international imbalance in the quality of life emerged as a prominent global concern in the mid-20th century, highlighted by postwar development studies and the first Human Development Reports. Disparities became increasingly visible through comparative indices, such as the Human Development Index, revealing persistent gaps between nations. International forums, including the United Nations and World Bank, have since underscored the issue, prompting ongoing research and policy debates on its causes and far-reaching implications.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Incidence

Income or output per capita is generally taken as the main indicator of the quality of life. In 1981 the per capita income of the richest country was nearly 220 times that of the poorest country and under present growth trends, international disparities will almost certainly widen. At present growth rates, it will take 70 to 90 years for the poorest countries to double their per capita income; even this will only slightly improve their standards of living. Meanwhile, their populations will double in 35 years or less.

Claim

The international imbalance in the quality of life is a grave injustice that cannot be ignored. While some nations thrive in prosperity, others are trapped in poverty, lacking access to basic needs like healthcare, education, and clean water. This disparity fuels suffering, stifles human potential, and perpetuates global instability. Addressing this urgent problem is not just a moral obligation—it is essential for a fair, peaceful, and sustainable world.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Counter-claim

The so-called "international imbalance in the quality of life" is vastly overstated and hardly a pressing issue. Every country has its own priorities, cultures, and definitions of well-being. Obsessing over global comparisons distracts from local progress and self-determination. Resources are better spent on internal development rather than futile attempts to equalize the world. Ultimately, this imbalance is a natural outcome of diversity, not a problem demanding urgent attention or intervention.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Broader

Narrower

Aggravates

Envy
Presentable

Aggravated by

Social neglect
Presentable
Sectoral imbalances
Unpresentable

Related

Strategy

Value

Quality
Yet to rate
Life
Yet to rate
Imbalance
Yet to rate
Balance
Yet to rate

Reference

SDG

Sustainable Development Goal #10: Reduced InequalitySustainable Development Goal #15: Life on Land

Metadata

Database
World problems
Type
(B) Basic universal problems
Biological classification
N/A
Subject
Content quality
Presentable
 Presentable
Language
English
1A4N
B4993
DOCID
11249930
D7NID
142639
Editing link
Official link
Last update
Oct 4, 2020