Incompatibility of long-term thinking and financial priorities
Nature
The incompatibility of long-term thinking and financial priorities refers to the conflict between immediate financial goals and the necessity for sustainable, future-oriented decision-making. This problem arises when individuals or organizations prioritize short-term gains—such as quarterly profits or immediate cost-cutting—over investments in long-term growth, innovation, and sustainability. Such a focus can lead to detrimental outcomes, including underinvestment in critical areas like research and development, employee training, and environmental stewardship. Ultimately, this misalignment can hinder overall progress, reduce competitiveness, and compromise future financial stability, creating a cycle of short-sightedness that undermines long-term success.
Incidence
A 2022 survey by the CFA Institute found that 65% of investment professionals believe short-term financial pressures frequently undermine long-term strategic planning in organizations worldwide. The problem is particularly acute in publicly traded companies, where quarterly earnings expectations often outweigh considerations for sustainability, innovation, or social responsibility. This tension is evident across sectors, from energy to technology, and is cited as a barrier to addressing global challenges such as climate change and infrastructure renewal.
In 2018, Unilever threatened to relocate its headquarters from the UK to the Netherlands, citing pressure from short-termist shareholders focused on immediate returns rather than the company’s long-term growth and sustainability strategy.
In 2018, Unilever threatened to relocate its headquarters from the UK to the Netherlands, citing pressure from short-termist shareholders focused on immediate returns rather than the company’s long-term growth and sustainability strategy.
Claim
There are only ways of encouraging non-spontaneous behaviour - regulation, education or moral persuasion and financial interests. As long as financial interest run against the other two, the likelihood of success is very limited; example smuggling, drug dealing. However, the ecological movement so far has ignored the connection between sustainability and the money system that underlies the financial priorities. Whenever the currency used for planning and contracts has positive interest rate, income or costs in the long term future are discounted for the present into irrelevance (discounted cash flow analysis).
Counter-claim
The notion that long-term thinking and financial priorities are incompatible is a misguided exaggeration. In reality, successful financial strategies inherently require foresight and planning. Prioritizing immediate gains over sustainable growth is shortsighted and detrimental. Businesses and individuals alike thrive when they balance short-term needs with long-term goals. Dismissing this compatibility as a problem undermines the very essence of sound financial management, which is about harmonizing present actions with future aspirations. Let's focus on real issues instead.
Broader
Narrower
Aggravates
Aggravated by
Related
Strategy
Metadata
Database
World problems
Type
(C) Cross-sectoral problems
Biological classification
N/A
Content quality
Unpresentable
Language
English
1A4N
J6065
DOCID
12060650
D7NID
133377
Last update
Oct 4, 2020
Official link