Felonious restraint
Nature
Felonious restraint is knowingly abducting another, restraining another under terrorizing circumstances or restraining another with the intent of holding him as a servant. This is generally regarded as a lesser crime than kidnapping and a greater crime than unlawful imprisonment.
Background
Felonious restraint emerged as a recognized global concern in the late 20th century, as international law enforcement agencies began documenting cases of unlawful confinement beyond national borders. High-profile incidents, including cross-border abductions and hostage situations, highlighted the problem’s prevalence and complexity. Increased reporting and legal scrutiny, particularly following the expansion of human rights monitoring in the 1990s, deepened understanding of felonious restraint as a distinct and pressing transnational issue.
Incidence
Felonious restraint, involving the unlawful restriction of a person's freedom of movement, is a persistent issue with global reach, affecting both developed and developing nations. Incidence rates are often underreported due to victims' fear or lack of legal recourse, but law enforcement agencies worldwide regularly document such cases, particularly in contexts of domestic violence, human trafficking, and abductions. The problem is exacerbated by social instability and weak judicial systems, making accurate global statistics difficult to obtain.
In 2023, a high-profile case occurred in St. Louis, Missouri, USA, where a man was charged with felonious restraint after unlawfully detaining a woman in his residence for several days.
In 2023, a high-profile case occurred in St. Louis, Missouri, USA, where a man was charged with felonious restraint after unlawfully detaining a woman in his residence for several days.
Claim
Felonious restraint is a deeply troubling crime that demands urgent attention. It strips individuals of their basic freedom and security, often leaving lasting psychological scars. Society cannot tolerate such violations of personal autonomy. The prevalence of felonious restraint highlights serious gaps in our protective systems and legal deterrents. Addressing this issue is not optional—it is a moral imperative to ensure safety, uphold justice, and protect the fundamental rights of every individual.
Counter-claim
Felonious restraint is not an important problem in our society. Compared to issues like violent crime, drug abuse, or economic inequality, its occurrence is rare and its impact limited. Law enforcement resources should be focused on more pressing threats to public safety. Overemphasizing felonious restraint distracts from real challenges and needlessly stokes fear. It simply does not warrant the attention or concern that more significant criminal issues demand.
Broader
Related
Strategy
Value
Metadata
Database
World problems
Type
(D) Detailed problems
Biological classification
N/A
Subject
- Societal problems » Crime
Content quality
Unpresentable
Language
English
1A4N
D4488
DOCID
11444880
D7NID
151939
Editing link
Official link
Last update
Oct 4, 2020