1. World problems
  2. Ecological debt

Ecological debt

  • Ecological overdraft

Nature

Every environmental problem represents an ecological overdraft of some sort.   Deforestation, water scarcity, species losses, soil erosion—each is an overuse of a natural asset, an excess withdrawal made temporarily possible by dipping into nature’s reserves. Even climate change and polluted rivers involve a component of ecological debt: It’s the amount by which pollutants loaded into the atmosphere and waterways exceeds the capacity of those natural sinks.

Ecological debt has an equity aspect when it is the debt accumulated by industrial countries on account of resource plundering, unequal trade, environmental damage and free occupation of environmental space to deposit waste. This appropriation of natural resources violates human rights and obstructs the development of the peoples in less developed countries. A 2021 study found that less powerful nations are the dumping grounds that make possible the cleaner and more affluent lifestyles of wealthy countries.  There is call for wealthy nations to compensate low-income countries for their excessive consumption.

Background

The concept of ecological debt emerged in the early 1990s, gaining prominence through international environmental justice movements and summits such as the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro. It highlighted the historical and ongoing environmental costs imposed by industrialized nations on less developed countries. Over time, ecological debt has been increasingly recognized in global policy debates, particularly regarding climate change, resource extraction, and the unequal distribution of environmental burdens and benefits.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Incidence

The repayable portion of ecological debt is enormous and accumulating rapidly. Estimates of the climate debt alone is estimated by the Center for Global Development to be in the tens of trillions of dollars.

The Global Footprint Network (GFN) has for decades tracked the use of many renewable resources relative to their growth—for example, the number of trees cut compared to new trees grown. For all of human history prior to 1970, the world’s people took from nature each year less than she generated. But in 1970, the planet’s supply of newly generated renewable resources was exhausted by December 30th. Thus, for the first time, humanity’s consumption of renewable resources exceeded Earth’s output (slightly, by one day’s consumption). By borrowing from nature's capital, this was humanity’s first experience with ecological debt at the global level.

Since then, what GFN calls “Earth Overshoot Day”—the day when human consumption of renewable resources exceeds what Earth can produce for the year—has arrived ever earlier. In 2022, Overshoot Day fell on July 28, meaning that for the remaining five months of 2022 humanity borrowed from nature to cover its consumption of renewable resources.

 

Claim

Ecological debt provides a different look not only at the legacy of the colonial period but also at the "era of development" after World War II. A lot of this development has been debt driven, not only in fiancial terms (South-North) but in ecological terms as well. Ecological debt points at the collective responsibility of industrialized countries for past violations of the right to a clean and safe environment in other countries. It also is another way of revealing the impossibility and undesirability of copying development paths of industrialized countries.

There are the ecological assets that will never be recovered—wasted nonrenewable resources such as copper, or species driven to extinction. These debts are unpayable and must be written off as total losses.

Default on our ecological debt would be calamitous. It would mean acceptance of ecosystem collapses, accelerated extinctions, blistering warming, and expansion of deserts, to name a few consequences.

Counter-claim

Ecological debt is an exaggerated concept that distracts from real, immediate issues facing society. The idea that nations "owe" each other for resource use is impractical and divisive, ignoring the benefits of technological progress and global trade. Instead of fixating on abstract environmental tallies, we should focus on innovation and economic growth, which have consistently improved living standards and environmental outcomes. Ecological debt is simply not a pressing problem.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Broader

Aggravated by

Related

Metadata

Database
World problems
Type
(C) Cross-sectoral problems
Biological classification
N/A
Content quality
Presentable
 Presentable
Language
English
1A4N
J4131
DOCID
12041310
D7NID
136088
Editing link
Official link
Last update
Feb 3, 2023