1. World problems
  2. Discriminatory wage scales

Discriminatory wage scales

  • Non-comprehensive wage scales
  • Biased wage scales
  • Disproportionate salary scales within countries
  • Unfair salary scales
  • Inequitable range of salaries

Nature

Discriminatory wage scales refer to pay structures that systematically assign lower wages to certain groups based on characteristics such as gender, race, ethnicity, or age, rather than qualifications or job performance. This practice perpetuates economic inequality and social injustice, as affected individuals receive less compensation for equivalent work. Discriminatory wage scales violate principles of fairness and equal opportunity, often contravening labor laws and human rights standards. Addressing this problem is essential for promoting workplace equity, improving employee morale, and fostering inclusive economic growth.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Background

Discriminatory wage scales emerged as a global concern during the early 20th century, when labor movements and international organizations began documenting systematic pay disparities based on gender, race, and ethnicity. The issue gained prominence with the establishment of the International Labour Organization in 1919, which highlighted wage discrimination in its conventions. Subsequent research and advocacy, particularly during the civil rights and feminist movements, deepened understanding of the pervasive and persistent nature of unequal pay worldwide.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Incidence

In the UK, for example, the person earning the highest corporate salary earns as much in a day as the person earning the lowest salary earns in a year. From 1980 to 1989, salaries of company directors rose by up to 856% in the UK at a time when the less privileged were exposed to reductions of: state pensions for a retired couple from 43.3% of average earnings to 32.7% (for a single person, from 27 to 20.5%); unemployment benefits from 21.5 to 16.3% for a single person; industrial benefit from 27.7 to 20.5 for death; maternity (34.7 to 25.2% for a couple; and invalid care allowance from 26 to 19.6% for a couple).

Claim

There is no standard universal income scale which guarantees all people the basic requirements necessary to sustain human life. There are also no adequate criteria that recognize the income needs of individual families.

Counter-claim

Discriminatory wage scales are not an important problem in today’s workforce. Modern employment practices and regulations ensure fair pay, making wage discrimination largely a thing of the past. Most claims about wage gaps are exaggerated or based on outdated data. Businesses prioritize talent and productivity over bias, and any remaining disparities are due to personal choices, not discrimination. Focusing on this issue distracts from more pressing economic concerns.This information has been generated by artificial intelligence.

Broader

Narrower

Aggravates

Wage discontent
Unpresentable

Aggravated by

Strategy

Showing bias
Yet to rate

Value

Disproportion
Yet to rate
Inequality
Yet to rate
Unfairness
Yet to rate
Bias
Yet to rate

SDG

Sustainable Development Goal #8: Decent Work and Economic GrowthSustainable Development Goal #10: Reduced Inequality

Metadata

Database
World problems
Type
(D) Detailed problems
Biological classification
N/A
Subject
  • Principles » Values
  • Research, standards » Measurement
  • Social activity » Employment conditions » Employment conditions
  • Societal problems » Imbalances
  • Content quality
    Unpresentable
     Unpresentable
    Language
    English
    1A4N
    D1133
    DOCID
    11411330
    D7NID
    151640
    Editing link
    Official link
    Last update
    May 20, 2022