Discriminatory communication

Nature

Communication, both verbal and non-verbal, can enrich or dehumanize life. Discriminatory communication can be injurious to racial, ethnic, female, older persons, children, and disabled groups, and exists in the mass media, at work, and in face-to-face meetings.

Background

Discriminatory communication emerged as a recognized global concern in the mid-20th century, particularly with the rise of international human rights discourse following World War II. Its significance grew as studies linked biased language in media, education, and public policy to the perpetuation of social inequalities. International bodies, such as UNESCO, began documenting and addressing the impact of discriminatory communication, highlighting its role in reinforcing stereotypes and impeding social cohesion across diverse societies.

Incidence

With older age groups, mass media tends to patronize and stereotype. Stories dwell on the problems and foibles of old age rather than its rewards and joys. It is invariable portrayed as a time of waning physical and mental powers, typified by canes, wheelchairs and persons who are child-like, self-indulgent, helpless and a bother to have around.

Claim

Non-discriminatory titles such as flight attendants, firefighters, letter carriers, sales clerks, spouses and chairperson go a long way to contributing to non-sexist communication.

Counter-claim

Discriminatory communication is vastly overblown as a societal issue. In reality, people are too quick to take offense, and most so-called "discrimination" is simply harmless banter or misunderstood intent. Focusing on this supposed problem distracts from real challenges we face. Society should stop obsessing over every word and instead prioritize genuine issues, rather than wasting time and resources on policing language that rarely causes any meaningful harm.